Search for: "MATTER OF T L S" Results 4581 - 4600 of 9,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2015, 7:07 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Frankly, after waiting years for new guidance on L-1B eligibility, I’m deeply disappointed. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 1:09 pm
  The big difference is the left wing mafioso can't sue your business for refusing to photograph their gay wedding.Unless the left wing repeals laws against slavery a gay person can not force a corporation/LLC to assign a specific individual to photograph their wedding or provide them some other good or service no matter how much they may want to do otherwise. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
And now that the matter has taken up an entire day in what is already a crowded motions court, they are doing so at the taxpayer’s expense. 3. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 8:40 am by Ken White
Int’l Soc’y for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 8:40 am by Ken White
Int’l Soc’y for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 11:55 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
And sometimes, no matter how careful you are, those mistakes happen on a federal income tax return. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 8:02 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
And while I would very much like to answer the Committee’s questions today, I’ve been advised by my counsel to assert my constitutional right not to testify or answer questions related to the subject matter of this hearing. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
  Does the FDA’s conclusion call off preemption no matter what were the reasons behind the conclusion, or whether those reasons were earlier known by the defendant? [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Cali’s Plumbing Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
It occasionally happens that an important case comes along for which there isn't an available Kat to write a blog-post. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:42 am by Tammy Binford
Although the opinion supports the employee’s position, it doesn’t completely accept her interpretation of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  “[W]hether a product is FDA-approved is a simple, easily verifiable matter, not the sort of complex inquiry that might be beyond the Court’s competence or might require the Court to invade the FDA’s rule-making authority,” and thus there was no need for preclusion. [read post]