Search for: "Matter of D." Results 4581 - 4600 of 52,880
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2013, 3:14 pm by Jon Sands
Although two closely relevant Ninth Circuit decisions pointed in opposite directions -- and one of those "provide[d] strong support" for the petitioner's claim, presenting a "very close factual situation to this case" -- and in fact were "almost impossible to reconcile," what mattered is that there was no clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court.Judge Burns would have held that the plea agreement foreclosed the petitioner's § 2254 case. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 3:53 am
And so the Board found that Narita was entitled to judgment on its Section 2(d) claim as a matter of law. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:49 am by Marty Lederman
”I cannot help but add a final note--a relatively trivial matter, to be sure, on such a solemn occasion; but this is, after all, a blog devoted to matters of constitutional law and governance, and so it should not go unmentioned that Dan has, of course, had a deep and lasting influence on the way we think about, and understand, such questions. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:00 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
As announced in this press release, Senators Tillis (R-NC) and Coons (D-DE) and Representatives Collins (R-GA-9), Johnson (D-GA-4) and Stivers (R-OH-15) have released a “bipartisan, bicameral draft bill” that would revise 35 USC § 101 and eliminate the current role of “judicial exceptions. [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:25 pm by EBuz
I admit, though, I'd be highly surprised to see an actual trial in this case. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 6:58 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Anna Eshoo (D-CA) alleging that she was sexually assaulted in high school by Brett Kavanaugh, a leading contender to fill the Supreme Court seat vacated by Justice Anthony Kennedy. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 12:12 pm by Larry
Under FRE 801(d)(2)(D), these documents are not hearsay because they are offered by an opposing party and were made by agents or employees. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:29 pm
The last two paragraphs of section D present conflicting terms: the first paragraph states that the losing party can submit the matter to a state court. [read post]
24 May 2014, 3:30 pm
As previously stated, in rendering a decision on a summary judgment motion, the Court is not to resolve issues of fact nor determine matters of credibility. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 9:48 pm by Jeff Gamso
No, in one sense it doesn't matter what you call it. [read post]