Search for: "State v. Bodi" Results 4581 - 4600 of 14,862
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2019, 12:29 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court in 1963 handed down the landmark decision known as Gideon v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:12 am
Verdugo-Urquidez (1989), in which the Court held that 4th Amendment was not violated by the overseas warrantless search of property belonging to Mexican nationals with no ties to the United States; United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:26 am
Five-and-a-bit months after the Opinion of Advocate General Wahl was published in Case C-125/14, [here, with Katnote here] in Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has delivered its decision, in response to a request for a preliminary ruling from the Hungarian Fővárosi Törvényszék (the Budapest Municipal Court).The facts of the underlying dispute are as follows. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 9:41 am by Zoe Tillman
The case has set the stage for the first big affirmative action battle since the Supreme Court's 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:11 pm by Ronald London
  Chisea v. 24x7digital thus becomes a case to watch for its potential to provide such guidance. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
“The state of mind of the accused infringer is notrelevant to this objective inquiry. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm by Rachel Price
 The decision will be of interest to public bodies dealing with requests for third party information and to private sector organisations that do business with, and provide information to, public bodies. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:55 am by CMS
The webpage and the link at the time read as follows:” “Enquiry forms HMRC has agreed with the professional bodies that where there is an ‘enquiry’, HMRC will correspond with the agent where one is authorised. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 5:57 pm by Francis Pileggi
The Delaware Supreme Court recently issued an epic opinion, ending the lengthy saga of litigation involving efforts by some stockholders of Wal-Mart to pursue claims in connection with alleged improprieties involving the Mexican subsidiary of Wal-Mart, in California State Teachers’ Retirement System v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 2:37 pm
" (The stay application was Rashid v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 1:06 pm by Harry Styron
The penalty is up to $5,000 if the governmental body purposely violates the Sunshine Law, which requires proof that the governmental body had “a conscious design, intent or plan” to violate the law “with awareness of the probable consequences. [read post]