Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 4581 - 4600
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2013, 5:31 am
But that doesn't mean this outlier will have been the last case in which a United States district court with a FRAND contract (and rate-setting) case before it precludes a patent holder from enforcing potential or actual ITC remedies. [read post]
19 May 2013, 1:06 am
The Microsoft v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 6:52 pm
In Romeike v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm
Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) stated that “the actions of the department have in fact impaired the First Amendment. [read post]
16 May 2013, 6:52 am
United States, a case involving a criminal prosecution under the Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act that is scheduled for oral argument in October. [read post]
15 May 2013, 7:48 am
Pelkey, holding that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 does not preempt state-law claims relating to the storage and disposal of a towed vehicle, as well as the Court’s cert. grant in Burnside v. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
14 May 2013, 10:49 am
”In Behn v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am
” In Bullock v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:38 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In its 15-page opinion in Righthaven LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:50 am
In Bullock v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:30 am
United States v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:17 am
With the Court’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 12:00 am
Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2013, 10:20 am
What does the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in CLS Bank Int’l v. [read post]
11 May 2013, 6:00 am
**In passing, Diamond v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 11:22 pm
Robart's Microsoft v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm
However, the European Commission's preliminary assessment is that the license agreement underlying that rate-setting case came into being under anticompetitive circumstances, calling into question whether there even is an enforceable agreement in place.Alternatively to a process in Germany, Google "suggest[ed] the [arbitration] panel [in the United States] employ a 'baseball arbitration' procedure to resolve any areas in which the parties are unable to reach agreement" (emphasis mine). [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:28 am
Kausal v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am
One of the central policy issues injected into the current case of AMP v. [read post]
