Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 4581 - 4600
of 5,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2018, 1:02 pm
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court in Murphy v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:01 pm
It said that United States v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:55 am
In Marsh v. [read post]
Centaurs, Jean Valjean, and a proposed three-sentence ruling on the meaning of favorable termination
13 Oct 2021, 2:58 pm
United States as amicus curiae Jonathan Ellis, assistant to the solicitor general, argued for the United States in support of Thompson. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:27 am
In the first paragraph of Roberts’ opinion in Trump v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:15 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
(Sotomayor, J., recused) March (5) Arizona v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:00 pm
The Louisiana dispute, Ardoin v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 9:56 am
In Schwab v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:39 am
United States, 20-5758Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should revisit and recede from its decision in Deal v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
(j) United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm
In Descamps v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:26 pm
The question this time, in Facebook v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
In invalidating the “disparagement” section of the Lanham Act in Matal v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
In invalidating the “disparagement” section of the Lanham Act in Matal v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
In invalidating the “disparagement” section of the Lanham Act in Matal v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
In invalidating the “disparagement” section of the Lanham Act in Matal v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
In invalidating the “disparagement” section of the Lanham Act in Matal v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
In invalidating the “disparagement” section of the Lanham Act in Matal v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 2:47 pm
Purcell v. [read post]
