Search for: "Defendant Doe 2"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 40,582
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2009, 4:07 am
In PeaceHealth, for example, the defendant was accused of bundling primary, secondary and tertiary medical care. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:48 am
720 ILCS570/401(d)(i) (West 2012); 720 ILCS 5/5–2 (West 2012). [read post]
Federal Court Clarifies What Prior Convictions Count Toward Career Offender Status Under Florida Law
2 Jan 2019, 9:18 am
Here, the defendant argued that his prior convictions should not count toward his career offender status on the grounds that marijuana is not a controlled substance and robbery is not a violent crime, because it does not require physical force. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:14 am
Teigen’s are unreliable because he does not provide any support for his conclusions. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:33 am
Writing for a 5-4 majority (7-2, if you count the concurrences), Justice Stevens opined that when the immigration consequences of a plea are clear, it is Constitutionally deficient for a defense attorney to neglect to inform the defendant of those consequences. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:19 pm
If it does not, criminal prosecutions can go forward against defendants with little or no connection to the United States, assuming that venue and other requirements are met. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:34 pm
Viewed in such contexts, the law does not apply to the telephone conversation. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 4:30 pm
On appeal from a verdict for the defendant, the plaintiff, Warren G. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 8:00 am
Doe and these defendants reached a settlement before trial that totaled $5.25 million. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 7:55 am
This court has articulated those requirementsin the form of a three-part test: “(1) whether the defendant‘purposefully directed’ its activities at residents of theforum; (2) whether the claim ‘arises out of or relates to’the defendant’s activities with the forum; and (3) whetherassertion of personal jurisdiction is ‘reasonable and fair. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:42 am
(Is it just me, or does this sound like the employment law version of 6 degrees of separation?) [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:11 am
Thereafter, the defendant (1) changed its adverse event reporting algorithm in response to FDA concerns, and (2) still later, instituted a Class II recall of the device. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 8:38 am
Issue #2: Does the cost insurance first get paid to the Plaintiff law firm for their disbursements incurred in pursuing the case; or does it first get paid out to the Defendants for their cost award at trial? [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 4:31 am
This analysis, however, does not protect the defendant from the potential of unconscious bias in the selection of the jury. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
But does the State affirmatively have to allege and prove a lack of consent? [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:01 pm
" Writing for a Court that was unanimous as to the result but disagreed slightly as to the reasoning, Kagan ruled that the statute does not require the Government to prove that a defendant intended to defraud a financial institution, only that the defendant intended to obtain bank property "by means of" a false statement. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
Justice Kabir while pronouncing the judgment with the concurrence of Justice Chelameswarm held as under:2. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Thus, while she does not challenge the grant of summary judgment on Counts 2 and 6, insofar as they concerned Drake’s negligence, Papadakis claims that those counts should stand to the extent that they challenged his willful and wanton acts. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Thus, while she does not challenge the grant of summary judgment on Counts 2 and 6, insofar as they concerned Drake’s negligence, Papadakis claims that those counts should stand to the extent that they challenged his willful and wanton acts. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:53 am
California leads the pack (16% of cases), followed by Texas (11%), Ohio (10%), New York (6%), and Georgia (6%).(3) State appellate courts affirmed 68% of trade secret decisions and reversed 30% of them.State appellate courts favor defendants. [read post]
