Search for: "Grant v. State" Results 4601 - 4620 of 61,124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2011, 8:20 am by Giovanna Shay
At oral argument in the Texas state prisoner’s federal habeas case Gonzalez v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:36 pm
Justice Hoffstadt begins today's opinion by saying the following:"Earlier this year, one of our sister courts in People v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 1:46 pm by MOTP
Bashaw v Republic State Mortgage Co, No 01-14-00427-CV (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 11:01 pm
... if you're seeking asylum in the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:27 am
The court, however, noted that a company being headquartered in a state does not mean that all contracts into which the company enters are made in that state. [read post]
9 Aug 2004, 9:45 am
July 27, 2004) stating: On the court's own motion, rehearing en banc is granted in this case. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:08 am by rhapsodyinbooks
As you know by now, in the opinion issued in Shelby County v. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 7:15 am by Eugene Volokh
City of Carbondale (Justice Alito also noted that he would have granted the petition): In Hill v. [read post]
United States and his Jarkesy concurrence, has called for a stricter test that would strike down statutes granting agencies broad discretion without clear direction from Congress. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Department, pursuant to CPLR §3211(a), moved to dismiss the "second amended petition/complaint".Supreme Court granted the Department's motion, denied the second amended petition/complaint, and dismissed the proceeding/action. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Department, pursuant to CPLR §3211(a), moved to dismiss the "second amended petition/complaint".Supreme Court granted the Department's motion, denied the second amended petition/complaint, and dismissed the proceeding/action. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 8:16 pm by Kate Howard
The petition of the day is: Hawkins v. [read post]