Search for: "IN RE B E S" Results 4601 - 4620 of 7,826
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2012, 11:04 am by thenambypamby
After all you’re a professional and it’s just a piece of human tissue. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:05 pm
Cases here: http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/KeyMadoff546Cases-SDNY-2010-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Picard's common law non-fraud claims ag insiders for failure to supervise, etc, not preempted by NY Martin Act. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/PicardvsMadoffs-BK-SDNY-Lifland-9-22-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Wagoner & in pari delicto rules dont apply to insiders so Picard has standing sue them for common law fraud.… [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:39 pm by Orin Kerr
Warshak had the contents of his private e-mail accounts obtained from his ISP without a warrant pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2703(b). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:22 am
 I plan to post these case development summaries in the coming weeks and then reprint them here so they're all collected in one handy place. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 3:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
MES thus argues that the February 8 e-mail “did not serve to supplement the mandatory Rule 26 disclosures or the interrogatory re- sponses. [read post]
  Sections 15(b)(4)(E) and 15(b)(6)(A) of the Exchange Act authorize the Commission to impose sanctions on a firm or anyperson that fails to reasonably supervise someone that is subject to the supervision of such firm or person who violates the federal securities laws. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:00 am by koherston
The Court rejected Father’s argument, stating: [W]e find it is simply a distinction without a difference. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 2:08 pm
Algranti lembrou que, entre 1975 e 2009, o Brasil produziu mais de seis milhões de toneladas de amianto, das quais mais de 80% permaneceram no país sob a forma de produtos diversos e de resíduos. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 2:49 am by John L. Welch
The Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register the mark BAGEL THINS, finding it to be merely descriptive of "bakery products, not including cookies" [BAGEL disclaimed]. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:41 am by cen
Darüber herrscht in der juristischen Literatur große Uneinigkeit. [read post]