Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 19,929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2019, 5:08 am
The Ninth Circuit concluded that the district court made the same errors in its 23(b)(3) choice of law analysis as it did in its refusal to certify the Rule 23(b)(2) class. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:10 am
Cir. 2009) Rule 50(a) permits a party to move for judgment as a matter of law on any issue as to which the other party has been fully heard. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 9:50 am
The parties agree that their submission to the [b]eis [d]in shall constitute an agreement to be bound by the [b]eis [d]in [d]ecision on any issue the [b]eis [d]in addresses, and the [b]eis [d]in shall have the authority to order monetary awards relating to the Jewish law matters before it, which awards may be confirmed in a court of law. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:01 pm
Unfortunately it doesn't. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:30 pm
Is there anything we don’t understand about a certain policy? [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 10:41 am
Indeed, that would be on a par with claiming that the Coase Theorem purports to show that it makes no difference who owns a particular legal entitlement, or that the Modigliani-Miller Theorem (MMT) shows that it makes no difference how one uses debt versus equity financing.It’s become well-recognized that the Coase Theorem, by showing that it makes no difference who owns the entitlement under specified circumstances (i.e., zero transaction costs, and where pertinent to one’s use of it no… [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:51 pm
matter concerned. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:59 am
Rule 901(b)(9) provides for authentication of evidence that derives from an automated process, and Rule 901(a) appears to set a relatively low bar; there must only be “evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 5:00 pm
In this case, the Commission was asked by the trial court to provide an interpretation of Rule 13d-3(b). [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm
You can’t be uncertainty averse to both; what matters is relative salience; whether people treat those as losses v. gains, etc.Q: what about people who just decide not to take either risk? [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:31 am
Superior Court Judge Herbert B. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 6:58 pm
The new bill is currently awaiting assignment from House Speaker B. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:19 am
Both said “Bruce Lee” or “B. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 12:39 pm
SO IF SOMEBODY’S LAUNCHING MISSILES OFF OUR COASTS, AND IT’S NOT US, then it’s a threat to national security no matter what the Pentagon says. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
Jasmine Abdel-Khalik, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law TM gives a power to suppress speech of third parties; this matters. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
(h/t to David Waldstreicher who I had a generative conversation about this topic with 2022.) [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 4:30 am
Was this some sort of express warranty that Plaintiff couldn’t severe his thumb if he didn’t use the cross bow properly? [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 5:47 pm
Mayoras and Danielle B. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 1:51 pm
(b) A lawyer shall not knowingly represent a person in the same or a substantially related matter in which a firm with which the lawyer formerly was associated had previously represented a client (1) whose interests are materially adverse to that person; and (2) about whom the lawyer had acquired information protected by Rules 1.6 and 1.9(c) that is material to the matter; unless the former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:49 pm
This should be simple to understand: if an invention is “B,” it must be described as “B,” not as “A” or “C. [read post]
