Search for: "Mark Case" Results 4601 - 4620 of 70,949
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2018, 11:24 am by Eugene Volokh
I don't think that they're intentionally getting it wrong, but I think- In the case of the Holocaust deniers, they might be, but go ahead. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:54 am
He is not without sympathy for parties in trade mark proceedings who feel hard-done-by and who convince themselves that, if only they can put their case before the hearing officer or judge, he or she will be sure to see how sincere and committed they are and will find some way of finding for them. [read post]
30 May 2024, 5:40 pm by Adam Klasfeld
Those cases turned on violations of federal campaign finance law. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:40 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Charging Instrument Indictment of Trump and 18-codefendants (Aug. 14, 2023) … [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 9:47 am by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
The post $226.5 Million Settlement in Independent Contractor Case Proceeds appeared first on HRWatchdog by Gail Cecchettini Whaley. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 7:40 pm by Prashant Reddy
The class of customers is of the high income group and there is no likelihood of confusion especially in the instant case where the mark relates to service. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 3:19 am
TTABlogger comment: Does it make sense for the Board to say. in case after case, that when the marks are identical, a lesser degree of similarity between the goods is needed to support a likelihood of confusion finding? [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 3:56 pm by Massachusetts Employment Law Letter
July 2014 marked the 50th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by Devin Ricci
On infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 11:32 am
There is no doubt the same objections had been routinely made in case after case, with the same results. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 1:57 pm
Harrington has been suspended and demoted due to his arrest of Mark Flanagan who reportedly obstructed a hit-and-run case. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 8:55 am by Luke Gilman
Court ordered relief in temporary restraining order in trademark case includes de-indexing from search engines: “The relief granted by the court is extraordinary in its scope, and includes: - an injunction against the defendants prohibiting them from using any Chanel marks or selling any Chanel products; - an injunction against the top-level domain name registry, directing it to change the registrar of record for the domain names to GoDaddy (!) [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 4:21 am
This being so, the Court applied the settled case-law, stating that for neologisms and word marks comprising a combination of word elements, descriptive character must be assessed in relation to the neologism or the word mark as a whole, since it is not sufficient to establish the descriptiveness of each element. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
For example, in this case, one of the marks used by the registered proprietor was the following:In this author’s view, it could also be said that the above is a composite mark containing the Patissier-Hat Device, the Aalst House Mark (rotated 90 degrees), as well as the Aalst Chocolate Word Element (minus the word “by”), i.e., that the Patissier-Hat Device and the Aalst Chocolate Word Element were actually used together. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 4:58 am
" In other words, the addition of the house mark was sufficient to distinguish the marks.Here, the Board opined that the facts of the case "track the Knight Textile case in nearly every respect" and found that "the evidence applicant has presented here meets and even exceeds the evidentiary showing in Knight Textile. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:59 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MARK DEAN SCHWAB Appellant, Case No. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:59 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MARK DEAN SCHWAB Appellant, Case No. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm by Alex Woolgar
The case law, however, strongly suggests that the position would be the same for designs as for trade marks. [read post]