Search for: "Park v. State" Results 4601 - 4620 of 11,110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am by Hutko
Some thirty minutes later, few hundred kilometers north, at the place which is now an inconspicuous Berlin parking lot, Adolf and Eva Hitler are just entering their personal study. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am by Hutko
Some thirty minutes later, few hundred kilometers north, at the place which is now an inconspicuous Berlin parking lot, Adolf and Eva Hitler are just entering their personal study. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 8:23 am by Bob Farb
West Virginia’s statute allowing the carrying of a concealed weapon with a permit may be such an example, based on the February 23, 2016, ruling of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 8:23 am by Bob Farb
West Virginia’s statute allowing the carrying of a concealed weapon with a permit may be such an example, based on the February 23, 2016, ruling of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Negligence in complying with the Open Meetings Law may not be sufficient to vacated decisions made at a meeting subject to its provisionsCutler v Town of Mamakating, 2016 NY Slip Op 01543, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Town of Mamakatingabolished its position of Parks Maintenance Supervisor.The then incumbent of the position, Oliver Cutler, challenged the Town’s action. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
In other news New South Wales may become the first state to institute laws for invasions of privacy, after the State Parliament’s law and justice committee recommended that NSW should “lead the way” in Australia with laws of this type. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 2:03 pm
Sprint is a limited partnership organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business in Overland Park, Kansas. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:55 pm by Mark Tushnet
Both the majority and dissent in today's decision in Lockhart v. [read post]