Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 29,302
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2018, 1:11 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 8:27 am
In Espinoza v. [read post]
PA: Need to secure a vehicle for officer safety does not require that the officer actually see a gun
15 Jul 2008, 12:23 pm
State v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 8:01 pm
") Applying United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:24 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 7:20 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:03 pm
The dissent seemingly discounts this evidence in the record by stating that the only credible evidence shows that CL and JV were hit within seconds after Maher pulled over. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 8:46 am
(Lampi, LLC v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 9:27 am
Workforce Solutions v. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 1:34 pm
" (p.269) Even the most elementary exposition of the model, by contrast, stresses that if individuals have consistent preferences, we can represent their behavior as maximization, but this is not their "motivation" any more than the fact that we can represent the motion of light waves by minimizing a Hamiltonian means that "light waves want to travel minimal paths. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:37 am
On May 20, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:29 am
" See United States v Larson, __ F.3d. __, 2007 WL 2192256 (9th Cir. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 10:21 am
” Former Solicitor General of the United States Seth P. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:44 am
Eighth, I expect United States v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 2:03 pm
By Jason Rantanen K/S HIMPP v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
State law claims: Yunker’s state law claims also suffer from a variety of deficiencies. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:18 pm
In the California state case, an individual resident of California, Suraj Kumar Rajwani (“Rajwani”), asserted ownership of the Domain (the “California Case”). [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 12:10 am
In contrast, the Eighth Circuit has rejected the duplicative aggravating factor theory when applied to the FDPA, see Purkey, 428 F.3d at 762, and the Fifth Circuit has withdrawn its support of the double-counting theory in light of Jones, see United States v. [read post]
