Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 43,292
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In its March 25, 2015 decision in Halioris v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
That issue was the subject of a recent federal court case, Chen v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am
He notes that the government has not intervened to state on the record that there would be sensitive information that would be disclosed if this case went to discovery. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 5:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
In Freundel v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Ford v. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:32 am
Machado Amadis v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:52 am
Today's New York Times refers to a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Kansas in the case of Landmark National Bank v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 4:02 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 5:48 am
We defend individuals accused of crimes in all New Jersey state and municipal courts, the New York State criminal courts in New York City, and all federal district courts in New Jersey and New York City. [read post]
Court of Federal Claims Dismisses Bad Men Clause Suit over Sexual Abuse Perpetrated by Stanley Weber
10 Mar 2022, 8:29 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:53 pm
In Gumbs v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:33 am
” According to court records, the single-car crash occurred in July 2010. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Respondent filed a CPLR Article 78 petition seeking a court order compelling the New York State Office of Court Administration [OCA] to disclose records requested by Petitioner pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law [FOIL], Public Officers Law §§84-90. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Respondent filed a CPLR Article 78 petition seeking a court order compelling the New York State Office of Court Administration [OCA] to disclose records requested by Petitioner pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law [FOIL], Public Officers Law §§84-90. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 3:46 am
7thCircuit-Seal.png In drug conspiracy, admission of recorded conversations of one defendant with a confidential informant were not barred by Crawford and the Confrontation Clause; the defendant's recorded statements were admissions of a party-opponent; the confidential informant's recorded statements were admitted to provide context of the defendant's statements and were not hearsay, in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 7:03 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:32 pm
In the case Burnett v. [read post]
