Search for: "State v. Stephens." Results 4601 - 4620 of 7,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Stephens     Eastern District of Michigan at Bay City 08a0424p.06  Klein v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am by Amy Howe
” Commentary on Michigan v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:00 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
” Gompers v United States, 233 U.S. 604, 610 (1914). [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:10 am by New Books Script
K 5410 T6 L65 2011 Transnational torture : law, violence, and state power in the United States and India Jinee Lokaneeta. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am by Andrew Hamm
” In another story for The National Law Journal (subscription required), Tony Mauro reports that Stephen Bright was “surprised” when the Court granted Foster v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am by Norman L. Eisen
§ 371, which prohibits conspiracies to defraud the United States in the administration of elections. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For an excellent discussion of the influence of the U.S. system and the twentieth century evolution of federal thought, see Stephen Tierney, The Federal Contract (2022) [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 1:20 am by Frank Cranmer
The ECtHR Grand Chamber judgment in Fedotova v Russia on the legal recognition of same-sex couples. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:14 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case is American Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 7:22 pm
Finally, he signed a typewritten statement in which he admitted the kidnapping and stated that 'the baby was left on 5 July 1956, still alive, in the bushes by exit 37 on Northern State Parkway about 11:40 A. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]