Search for: "State v. Welcome" Results 4601 - 4620 of 6,372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2011, 2:27 am by Fiona de Londras
There is still time to make changes to the paper before publication and any comments are most welcome! [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:42 am
There is still time to make changes to the paper before publication and any comments are most welcome! [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 11:32 pm
This contribution suggests that scents may be more easily registered in the near future as a consequence of the EU reform of trade marks and of some technological innovations.Scents are signs because they can convey information (Phillips Electronics NV v Remington Consumer Products Ltd (No. 1) [1998] RPC 283, 298). [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
” Copyright Promotes Knowledge The copyright statutes passed in the States prior to the drafting of the Constitution use similar language. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
(Spicy IP) Customs Authority as copyright watchdogs: A welcome initiative? [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:32 am by Rachel Sandler
United States Olympic Comm., 483 U.S. 522, 524 [9] Id at 544. [10] Olympic Committee Demands Local Gyro Stand Change Names (August 24, 2012) [11] Stop the Olympic Prison v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 1:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v] CFIUS is a US government interagency committee that reviews certain transactions involving foreign investment in the United States to determine their effect on national security. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
A waiver has to be express, and on the record The Ramey court relies on its earlier decision in State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:33 pm by Eoin Daly
We are delighted to welcome another guest post from Dr Conor O’Mahony, Lecturer in Constitutional Law at University College Cork. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:38 pm by GuestPost
We are delighted to welcome another guest post from Dr Conor O’Mahony, Lecturer in Constitutional Law at University College Cork. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:26 am by Jon
States are barred by a Supreme Court precedent, Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
We could only resist the attacks of the state. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:21 pm
(The AmeriKat has to admit that she has not seen this opinion yet, so any comments on this are welcome!). [read post]