Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 11,371
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2013, 8:39 am
California, the Court reflected upon the resurrection of an offense after the statute of limitations had passed. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 6:54 am
Both the District Court and the Ninth Circuit held that the clause barring class actions was unconscionable under California law. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:50 am
The article addresses a recent case by the Supreme Court of the United States, Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 12:44 pm
CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION CASES Vol. 89, No. 3 March 2024 A Report of En Banc and Significant Panel Decisions of the WCAB and Selected Court Opinions of Related Interest, With a Digest of WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review © Copyright 2024 LexisNexis. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:58 am
The California district court initially ruled that the new class action was barred by collateral estoppel. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 8:03 am
” “For instance, the California Evidence Code covering attorney-client privilege requires lawyers to advise clients of state and federal law conflicts, and should be incorporated in engagement letters to balance ethical obligations. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:05 am
So it’s a big deal for the trademark bar that the Court will hear trademark cases on consecutive days in the first week of the December argument session. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 11:55 am
The court held 7-0 that Oklahoma had an interest in business-friendly legislation both as applied to local businesses and to out-of-state businesses. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 11:59 am
Rosette (Sovereign Immunity) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlMatter of Delaney (Attorney Discipline) U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:11 pm
Corey 13-1149 Issue: Whether California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard is unconstitutional because it discriminates against out-of-state fuels and regulates interstate and foreign commerce that occurs wholly outside of California. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 2:12 pm
As a threshold matter, the panel determined that the dormant Commerce Clause (whose aim is to limit economic protectionism through regulations designed to benefit in-state economic interests by burdening out-of-state competitors) did not bar application of the California Labor Code to interstate employers, and that certain federal statutes did not preempt the California Labor Code’s application to interstate employers operating across state… [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 2:12 pm
As a threshold matter, the panel determined that the dormant Commerce Clause (whose aim is to limit economic protectionism through regulations designed to benefit in-state economic interests by burdening out-of-state competitors) did not bar application of the California Labor Code to interstate employers, and that certain federal statutes did not preempt the California Labor Code’s application to interstate employers operating across state… [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 8:22 pm
The District Court also ruled that section 546(e) did not bar the trustee from avoiding “actual” fraudulent transfer claims asserted under section 548(a)(1)(A). [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 8:22 pm
The District Court also ruled that section 546(e) did not bar the trustee from avoiding “actual” fraudulent transfer claims asserted under section 548(a)(1)(A). [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 8:22 pm
The District Court also ruled that section 546(e) did not bar the trustee from avoiding “actual” fraudulent transfer claims asserted under section 548(a)(1)(A). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 4:33 am
No representative in Congress explicitly or implicitly referred to any state or federal court decision on disqualification during the debates over the Enforcement Act. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 8:51 am
Whitaker’s appointment may now be before the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:36 am
Although state courts are slightly more efficient than federal courts in California due to the state courts’ own “fast track” rules (which yield intervals to trial of roughly twelve to eighteen months), wise disputants and their lawyers should always consider pre-litigation dispute resolution and ADR options before initiating a lawsuit. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 9:57 am
The Court of Appeals in Tennessee reviewing Mr. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Another reminder of the narrow scope of Evidence Code section 1152's protections has just come come down from California's Second District Court of Appeal in Zhou v. [read post]
