Search for: "Bui v. State" Results 4621 - 4640 of 9,825
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2014, 7:09 pm by Joy Waltemath
Requiring an employer to keep a job open for so long doesn’t qualify as a reasonable accommodation, said the court, pointing out that reasonable accommodations “are all about enabling employees to work, not to not work” (Hwang v Kansas State University). [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:54 pm
People or organizations who occasionally rent the technology, for instance by buying newspaper space, broadcast time, or the services of a printing company, are just as protected as newspaper publishers or broadcasters. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:06 am by Joy Waltemath
His free exercise and freedom of association claims also failed as a matter of law (Fields v City of Tulsa, May 22, 2014, Hartz, H). [read post]
23 May 2014, 9:30 am by azatty
(There’s even a seminar at the upcoming State Bar Convention on the topic.) [read post]
21 May 2014, 11:03 pm by Annette Burns
      Another Facebook privacy case, United States v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:04 am by Stephen Page
It is actual reliance by the promisee, and the state of affairs so created, which answers the concern that equitable estoppel not be allowed to outflank Jorden v Money by dispensing with the need for consideration if a promise is to be enforceable as a contract. [read post]
19 May 2014, 12:04 pm
[For those wish to the long-form legal argument, the Pacific Legal Foundation briefs in Sissel v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In 2006, for instance, Justice Anthony Kennedy stated as simple fact in eBay v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:09 am by Peter Mahler
Schweitzer in JPS Partners v Binn, 2014 NY Slip Op 31204(U) [Sup Ct, NY County May 6, 2014], came at the behest of a 1.93% investor in the parent company, a New York limited liability company known as Binn and Partners, LLC, controlled by its sole managing member, Moreton Binn. [read post]
17 May 2014, 1:14 pm by Sean Hanover
For a lively and informative discussion on personal jurisdiction in the context of commercial transactions, read International Shoe Co. v. [read post]