Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 12,654
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am
Lord Justice Leveson recommends that, The Report of the Law Commission on Aggravated, Exemplary and Restitutionary Damages should be adopted in relation to its recommendations that legislation should provide that … (b) exemplary damages should be retained (although re-titled as punitive damages). [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:59 pm
They’re generalists, not Fourth Amendment nerds. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 11:46 am
Justice Gorsuch's majority opinion needed five votes. [read post]
3 May 2018, 7:45 am
Justices O’Donnell and DeGenaro have recused themselves from the case. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
Not surprisingly, then, the Justices didn’t ask any questions about the argument until well into Mitchell’s argument. [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:55 am
Second, all of the opinions save Justice Breyer’s concurrence focus on history in reaching their conclusions. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
Nothing in this opinion says anything about fractional shares. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 9:47 am
Judges complain that the public should “read the opinion” and that criticism is unfair because they’re delicate geniuses dealing in nuance, meanwhile this court opens the door to crunching opinions into one-minute capsules. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
More important, the opinion necessarily implies that a medico-legal diagnosis of diseases such as asbestosis or silicosis must comply with the professional standards applicable to medical opinions. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:38 am
It seems that lawprofs are obsessed with keeping track of how often they're cited in a judicial opinion, that being their equivalent of how many convictions (or maybe hot chicks?) [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:13 am
We’re no clearer on either issue today than we were before the ruling. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
(In re Todd L. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 1:00 am
In a communication pursuant to Article 113 EPC, the board informed the appellant of its provisional opinion on the merits of the case and that it would interpret the appellant's requests in the sense that the decision under appeal was to be set aside, that the appellant was to be re-established in his rights in respect of the period for payment of the renewal fee for the fifth year with surcharge and that the case was to be remitted to the department of first instance for… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
However, that did not stop the Supreme Court, in an opinion authored by Trump appointee Justice Neil Gorsuch and joined by Bush II appointee Chief Justice John Roberts, from holding in 2020 in Bostock v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
In that closely-watched case, see slip opinion in Caperton v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 4:12 am
When they’re “calling for” social justice, it’s obvious they’re advocating. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:18 pm
Petrotech Res. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 3:07 am
But then, as long as we’re musing about impossibilities, go big or go home. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:28 am
But in a plurality opinion, in which Justice Kavanaugh recused himself and Justice Alito joined with Kagan because, well, it was SORNA, it was clear in his concurrence that he was open to revisiting the entire concept of congressional delegation. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 4:44 pm
Madam Justice Lax went on to re-frame the issue by noting that Ms. [read post]
