Search for: "Label v Label" Results 4621 - 4640 of 13,304
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Supreme Court handed down its decision on the case McCleskey v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm by Schachtman
  Bristol, of course, was blinded to which was which, but was required to label each according to its manner of preparation. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:01 am
All parties favoured the exploration of other solutions in addition to patent law.

 Amandine Métier (Véron & Associés), Thomas Misgaiski (HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER) and Vittorio Cerulli Irelli (Trevisan Cuonzo) had the pleasure of being joined by Judge Peter Blok of the Court of Appeal in The Hague to explore the CJEU's ruling on Huawei v ZTE, the national aftermath and the Judge's perspective. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Implied consents to trade marks considered in Marussia Communications v Manor Grand Prix Racing [2016] EWHC 809 https://t.co/XUTNTSuHxU -> Major Labels File Copyright Suit To Block Access To Kickass Torrents ♫ https://t.co/smbJlLpxtd https://t.co/kwYn9rzEj9 -> After surprising growth in 2015, music industry seeks fairer revenues https://t.co/XeghoYNVfW -> Review of e-Privacy Directive https://t.co/dP8HQcWb8h -> Fourth Circuit Finds Potential Coverage For Data… [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:01 am
This is so because there is no way for law enforcement to know in advance how a criminal may label or code his computer files and/or documents which contain evidence of criminal activities. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/yOydyyJdg0 -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2016-04-13 https://t.co/i1qoG2Y3HM -> Supreme Court denies leave to appeal in Merck v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 3:30 pm by Ad Law Defense
** How can we “Know It When We See It” to divine when the FTC will label an all natural claim misleading? [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:30 am by Jason J. Kim and Andrew J. Peterson
The Ninth Circuit, home of the infamous “Food Court,” has now invoked that doctrine and has ordered the stay of a pending “natural” mislabeling class action in Kane v. [read post]