Search for: "Long v State"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 45,275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Tony Booker (1980)American antislavery law long denied the problem of sexual assault in slavery. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 2:32 pm
In Government of the Province of Manitoba v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:33 am
Ashcroft and Golan v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Freeman v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 2:30 pm
It's super long. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 3:03 pm
In response, the Legislature expressly changed the statute -- stating that the Court of Appeal's decision was "contrary to the purposes" of the statute -- with the express goal of overruling that decision and squarely requiring a bond in all circumstances prior to the filing of an appeal.Public policy is similarly served by such a rule. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 3:35 pm
Sims, and from United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 2:04 pm
" Every Nation Campus Ministries v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:43 am
In this post, Ross Ludlow, Legal Support Assistant at Matrix Chambers, comments on the case of R v Maughan (Northern Ireland) [2022] UKSC 13. [read post]
26 Jun 2006, 5:59 am
In its decision today in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:55 am
The list of victims is a long one and it includes California’s redevelopment agencies. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 8:20 am
Forty years ago, the Supreme Court decided Chevron v. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
There was, in my view, no allegation of scandal beyond the stated facts. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm
Long and the identification of adequate and independent state grounds to support a state-court judgment (and thus to preclude federal habeas relief): Rocha v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 11:45 am
Recent Supreme Court decisions such as Hudson v Michigan (2006) and Herring v United States (2009) have sparked a new debate over the efficacy of exclusionary remedy, and once again drawn its continued viability as a constitutional mandate into question. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:11 am
Baker v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:08 pm
It would mean that Congress could fund religions just so long as it did not establish one State religion. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 11:44 am
In short, the Appellate court held that the only compelling interests that a state has in this regard is where the child is suffering from abuse, neglect etc. or where the grandparents have already developed a long and substantial relationship with the grandchild. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
The United States has long drawn a line between the work of federal employees in public service and the use of such employees for political purposes. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 3:30 am
Susan and I will address Title III of the ADA, the Gil v. [read post]
