Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 4621 - 4640 of 21,686
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2022, 12:42 pm by News Desk
Based on the chicken staying in the enclosed bag, fully labeled for USDA compliance including a mark of inspection, the kit is excluded from USDA oversite. [read post]
10 May 2012, 1:56 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Helena Partnerships Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs [2012] EWCA Civ 569 (09 May 2012) Barker v Hambleton District Council [2012] EWCA Civ 610 (09 May 2012) London Borough of Enfield v Outdoor Plus Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 608 (09 May 2012) Slater v Stephen Mark St Patrick Condappa [2012] EWCA Civ 598 (09 May 2012) Owen Ernest Wood & Ors v Hudson Industrial Services Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 599 (09 May 2012) LE… [read post]
4 May 2011, 12:14 pm by Mike Scarcella
Varney noted in the letter that the Utah state attorney general, Mark Shurtleff, has announced an intention to file suit against the BCS, established 13 years ago. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
  To construe “these four puzzling opinions that have few common aspects,” Tyree employed the analysis for such situations adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Marks v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
Small Business Capital Corp., Mark Feathers; Investors Prime Fund, LLC; and SBC Portfolio Fund, LLC.Case number: 12-cv-3237 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Case filed: June 21, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: November 6, 2013 11/21/2013 02/19/2014 2013-105 SEC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 12:02 pm by Law Lady
SPCP GROUP V, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Appellee. 4th District.Municipal corporations -- Ordinances -- Red light cameras -- Ordinances imposing penalties for red light violations detected by devices using cameras were preempted by state law prior to effective date of Mark Wandall Traffic Safety ActRICHARD MASONE, Petitioner, vs. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:19 pm
Case T 647/11 Asos plc v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Roger Maier, a decision of the General Court of the European Union (Seventh Chamber) this past Tuesday, is just one piece in a rather larger jigsaw of interlocking litigation between two assertive brand owners. [read post]