Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES" Results 4621 - 4640 of 9,966
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2015, 6:54 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Practitioners and corporate counsel should not be without it on their desk, since the Report is the sole compendium of its kind in the United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am by Eric Goldman
The search results contained book titles and page numbers containing the relevant terms. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
First a word about the plaintiff: Some Kat readers may recall that Pom Wonderful prevailed in a closely watched decision given by the United States Supreme Court on June 12, 2014, Pom Wonderful LLC v Coca Cola Company. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 4:51 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
” Volokh thinks DiRosa’s post—even if it advocates murder—advocates murder at some indefinite future time, making it protected speech pursuant to a pair of United States Supreme Court decisions—Brandenburg v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 10:18 am
So I thought I would flag the opinion today in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Two Cheers for Recess Appointments Peter Shane (Ohio State University) | June 26 As losses go, NLRB v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  In this case the United States Supreme Court held that a state attorney general action (really brought by contingent fee counsel proceeding in an AG’s name), ostensibly on behalf of all the citizens of a state, did not qualify as a “mass action” under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) so as to allow removal to federal court. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 11:40 am by Michelle Kisloff and Arthur Kim
  The subsequent class actions, on behalf of United States customers, were consolidated into the District of Minnesota. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
We would like these to be no more than four (4) pages long; and to be in English. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 7:54 am by George Ticoras, Esq.
Teilborg of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, relied on his prior determination finding A.R.S. [read post]
In Maryland, hotel operators convinced the state legislature to pass laws which apply to HMAs that attempt to circumvent the above judicial decisions. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 1:30 pm by Schachtman
” Wall Street Journal (Nov. 6, 2002). [2] Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 10:42 am by Timothy P. Flynn
The decision cites to Judge Friedman's ruling in the DeBoer case as well as the seminal case on federal benefits: United States v Windsor. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 5:51 am by SHG
But as the Appellate Division recognized, the United States Supreme Court has consistently held that an arresting officer’s subjective intent, however determined, offers no basis for negating an objectively valid arrest. [read post]