Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 41,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2018, 7:51 am
The oral argument in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 5:51 pm
In 2014, Texas state senator Bob Deuell was running for reelection. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
Constitution, Congress has the power to dictate when, where, and how elections are held, and state election laws that conflict with federal ones are therefore preempted and without effect. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:23 am
This is change that is in some sense legal, perhaps even equivalent in significance to a formal amendment, but falls outside the Article V process. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 2:13 am
Allegiant Power, LLC, No. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 11:29 am
(Jarkesy v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:17 pm
Power Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:02 am
Because “[t]he link between fantasy and intent is too tenuous for fantasy [alone] to be probative,” United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:52 am
The judgment was delivered by the special bench of the High Court, consisting of Justices GS Kulkarni and Neela Gokhale, in Shivangi Agarwal & Ors. v. the Union of India & Ors. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
Power & Light Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 11:14 pm
Topics covered will probably include California Proposition 19 and the ways in which the growth of the War on Drugs has undermined constitutional limits on federal power, such as in the case of Gonzales v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:45 am
Maryland, and NLRB v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:06 pm
Smith successfully challenged the constitutionality of sodomy laws in the landmark Supreme Court opinion, Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 6:19 am
Jonathan Adler, at the Volokh Conspiracy, thinks that Mass v. [read post]
Do Oregon circuit court judges have the power to review the decisions of other circuit court judges?
29 Oct 2012, 9:57 am
Oregonian v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 6:49 am
City of Lima v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:32 pm
The transcript of oral argument in Bond v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 6:29 am
On 5 February 2021, the UK Supreme Court decided the case of R (oao KBR, Inc.) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2021] UKSC 2 regarding the extraterritorial scope of the Serious Fraud Office’s (“SFO”) investigatory powers. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens, born or naturalized, under the stipulations of this Convention. [read post]
5 May 2012, 1:00 pm
In the Apprendi line of cases, Scalia consistently sought to contrast Breyer’s vision with what he characterized as the “common-law ideal of limited state power” (to quote his opinion for the majority in Blakely v. [read post]
