Search for: "State v. A. T. D."
Results 4621 - 4640
of 23,978
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm
Medicaid After-Hours Claims Audits (CPT Code 99050 / CPT Code 99051) by State Medicaid Regulators are Continuing. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm
Medicaid After-Hours Claims Audits (CPT Code 99050 / CPT Code 99051) by State Medicaid Regulators are Continuing. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:49 am
Allen v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:47 am
” Washington didn’t do that. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:07 am
” Washington didn’t do that. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 9:29 am
” – Professor Daniel Tanovich @dtanovich In R v S. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
FEC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
United States v Meng, 2020 BCSC 785 [82] Ms. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 3:59 am
At Courthouse News Service, Tim Ryan reports that “[t]he tangled arbitration dispute concerns several U.S. and foreign countries and the requirements of the so-called New York Convention, an international pact that requires the United States and 159 other countries to enforce arbitration agreements struck between companies in other member states. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:04 pm
Section 49 states that an individual who has contravened or failed to comply with an order or the Act is liable to a maximum fine of $10,000 or imprisonment of up to 6 months or both for a first offence and up to additional fines of up to $1,000 a day if the offence continues (fines increase to a maximum of $25,000 or up to 12 months imprisonment for subsequent offences or both and a maximum of $25,000 for each day the offence continues). [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 1:21 pm
Lemberg Law, LLC v. eGeneration Marketing, Inc., 2020 WL 2813177, No. 18-cv-570 (CSH) (D. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:58 pm
Johnson and U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
” Gunn v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
” Gunn v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 9:14 am
See, e.g., U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 8:03 am
Under Employment Division v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
Penal Code § 9.42; see, e.g., McFadden v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
In Banister v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:54 am
”) (quoting Advisory Committee Note to 2000 Amendments to Rule 702); Citizens State Bank v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:09 pm
Just last term, in Manhattan Community Access v Halleck, the Supreme Court affirmed that the act of serving as a platform for the speech of others did not eliminate that platform’s own First Amendment right to editorial freedom.But the EO doesn’t just get the law wrong—it wants the FTC to punish platforms that don’t adhere to the erroneous position that online platforms are “public forums” legally barred from editorial freedom. [read post]
