Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 25,958
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2013, 1:54 pm
CVS CaremarkMen's Journal Beats Lawsuit Alleging Violation of California’s “Shine the Light” Privacy Statute -- Boorstein v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
As the parties in the instant proceeding had not “collectively bargained for a procedure to be followed when an officer contests a light-duty determination,” the Appellate Division ruled that the County was free to fashion a hearing remedy so long as its procedure provided Thomas with administrative due process.The Appellate Division, citing Kigin v State of NY Workers’ Compensation Board, 24 NY3d 459, said: "Generally, procedural due process… [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 7:57 am
(V. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:09 pm
Circuit heard oral arguments in this case, Mozilla v FCC. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
While the standards for expert witness testimony may differ between state and federal courts, all federal courts are bound by Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Daubert v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:59 pm
Comment The Court’s willingness to substitute its view for that of the French courts may come as a surprise following its recent “light-touch” approach to reviewing the findings of a domestic court in privacy challenges (see for example von Hannover (No.2) and (No.3) and Lillo-Stenberg v Noway). [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:49 am
Negotiating administrative procedures to administer General Municipal Law Sections 207-a and 207-cRiverhead v Foote, State Sup. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:23 am
In light of this conclusion, we do not address the issue of whether Hill abandoned the phone.State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 12:31 pm
The United States Supreme Court today held oral argument in Federal Express v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:46 pm
” In contrast, after United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 10:09 pm
” In contrast, after United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 12:58 am
The court denied defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings that the asserted method claims were invalid in light of In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943 (Fed. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 5:58 pm
Decades after the United States Supreme Court issued its 1954 desegregation mandate in Brown v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:08 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:23 pm
Although premised on mere statutory interpretation, the opinion in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm
This week, my colleague, Jeanne Fromer, and myself had the pleasure of hosting a Tri-State conference on Intellectual Property at Fordham Law School. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 1:09 pm
See Lopez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 3:30 am
Amanda Frost, “By Accident of Birth”: The Battle over Birthright Citizenship After United States v. [read post]
