Search for: "UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR" Results 4621 - 4640 of 7,874
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
United States Supreme Court distinguishes a law from a regulation for the purposes the federal whistle blower statute Department of Homeland Security v MacLean, USSC #13-984 A federal air marshal publicly disclosed that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) had decided to cut costs by removing air marshals from certain flights. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 1:01 pm by Kelly Buchanan
Money transfers sent to Cuba from the United States or from individuals subject to U.S. jurisdiction are governed by applicable U.S. regulations. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 2:30 pm by Anita M. Sorensen
For years the United States Department of Labor (DOL) Wage and Hour Division has aggressively investigated and sought to punish employers who are unaware that their normal termination procedures are insufficient in H-1B cases. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:00 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
The Unites States District Court for the District of New Jersey applied a relatively narrow definition of “employee. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:37 pm by Donald Clarke
Any deviation from this default principle must have a source in law (i.e., rules issued by the National People’s Congress or its Standing Committee), administrative regulations (i.e., rules issued by the State Council), or a State Council decision (Art. 22). [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 1:24 pm by Associated Press
Union membership in the United States is down slightly, accounting for just over 11 percent of the workforce last year, the Labor Department reported Friday. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 5:13 am by Daniel E. Cummins
    The Secretary of Health bases these adjustments on the most recent changes in the Consumer Price Index reported annually by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor. [read post]
  For example, the Service Contract Act (“SCA”), 41 U.S.C. chapter 67, is applicable to certain Federal contracts and subcontracts that utilize service employees to furnish services in the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 9:45 am by John T. McDonald
Instead, the Court sided with the NJ Department of Labor (DOL) and its proposed test (the ABC test). [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:45 am by Naumes Law
Circuit Court of Appeals, and the Bala decision may be appealed to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:57 am by Michael Markarian
It is urgently needed, as some companies have been poised to open horse slaughter plants in the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:15 am by Joy Waltemath
” The Department of Labor’s Occupation Outlook Handbook provided such a profile, upon which the agency relied. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 1:18 pm by Anne B. Sekel
On September 15, 2014, the United States Department of Labor’s (DOL) Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs announced a proposed rule that prohibits federal contractors from discharging or otherwise discriminating against employees or job applicants “because such employee or job applicant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
The Speech may be accessed from Penn State news  here.Dean [Jules] Heller [of the Department of Arts and Architecture], members of the faculty and members of the student body of this great institution of learning, ladies and gentlemen. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-9972, concerning a similar issue. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 11:19 am by James J. La Rocca
La Rocca is an Associate in the Gibbons Employment & Labor Law Department. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Labor Code § 2698 et seq., is so distinguishable from a “class action” waiver that it is immune from the otherwise preemptive effect of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. [read post]
Sleepy’s argued that plaintiffs’ status as employees should be decided under the “right to control” test applied by to ERISA claims by the United States Supreme Court in Nationwide Mutual Ins. [read post]