Search for: "United States Solicitor General"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 4,872
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: Art, access and the public domain after Bridgeman v Corel’ – 29 April, New York City: (creativecommons.org), (Public Knowledge) US: ACI ‘Paragraph IV disputes’ conference – 30 April – 1 May, New York City: (Orange Book Blog) Pharma & Biotech Pharma & Biotech - General Canada: Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) departs from its guidelines in determining price in recent decision: (Gowlings), … [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
FDR rewarded Jackson with stewardship of the DOJ’s Antitrust Division in 1937, then appointed him solicitor general (1938), then attorney general (1940) and, finally in 1941, Supreme Court justice. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Solicitor General to review the matter. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
For example, in 2008, four justices wanted to hear the views of the Solicitor General before deciding the merits of Medellin v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:12 am
Solicitor General Michael R. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm
RTE reports on a trial in a defamation claim brought by solicitor Gerald Kean over an article in the Irish Daily Star. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 11:19 am
Kisor didn’t merely argue for a narrowing construction; that was the U.S. solicitor general’s angle. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:05 am
I suppose it is predictable that the Solicitor General would appear in support of B&B: providing institutional support for the PTO and the Board, which presumably would resonate more generally to give federal administrative rulings more preclusive effect in general, the Solicitor General argues that the Board’s rulings are entitled to preclusive effect when the Board considers the same question as the district court. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:59 am
Solicitor General Neal K. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:55 pm
” But when Deputy Solicitor General Edwin Kneedler, a career civil servant who has argued over one hundred cases at the Court, started his argument, he too faced tough questions, particularly from the Court’s more conservative Justices. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:19 am
Solicitor General Prof. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:21 pm
” That statement will generate vast amounts of litigation in the lower courts. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
They made the following pertinent observations: applying Swift v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] EWCA Civ 193, under the Convention a state need only pursue a legitimate aim in a proportionate way: Strasbourg does not demand that it do any more; the court must give considerable weight to informed legislative choices, at least where the state is seeking to reconcile the competing interests of different groups in society; and a legislative or regulatory scheme… [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:17 pm
This case was a culmination of years of lobbying by the big media groups, and in particular News International, to import into the UK law of defamation the same pre-eminence given to free speech by the United States, based on the first amendment of its constitution. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 am
The UK Government has laid down three tests for the acceptance of further Scottish Government amendments to the Scotland Bill: they must be based on detailed proposals; they must deliver clear benefits to Scotland, without prejudice to the rest of the United Kingdom; and they must generate cross-party consensus. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
Research & resources In an unpublished paper entitled “Quacks like a Duck: a New Test for News-Media Libel in the United States”, Carrie Leonetti of the University of Oregon School of Law argues that the actual-malice standard promotes sloppy reporting. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:36 pm
See United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
He last appeared before the Supreme Court in November 2002, six months before the Senate confirmed his nomination to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
United States — in which a splintered majority of the Supreme Court held that the CWA does not regulate all wetlands. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Code generally requires an individual, beginning in 2014, either (i) to ensure that she and her dependents are “covered under minimum essential coverage” for financing health care costs—coverage that can include, inter alia, government-sponsored health insurance such as Medicare or Medicaid, insurance under an employer-sponsored plan, or “coverage under a health plan offered in the individual market within a State”—or (ii) to make what the Act… [read post]
