Search for: "United States v. Texas" Results 4621 - 4640 of 8,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2010, 11:08 pm by Fiona de Londras
Next Steps in the United States There is little doubt that, at some point, Perry v Schwarzenegger will end up in front of the US Supreme Court for a final analysis. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 5:25 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Frank Perkins Hixon, Jr.Case number: 14-cv-00158 (United States District Court for the Western District of Texas)Case filed: February 20, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 20, 2015 5/29/2015 8/27/2015 2015-46 In the Matter of Larry C. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 10:39 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
RobbinsCase number: 13-cv-06694 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: September 23, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 27, 2013 01/17/2014 04/17/2014 2013-125 SEC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 10:34 am by Dennis Crouch
That would be an unfortunately crabbed view of the Conference’s statutory authority to “prescribe general rules of practice and procedure . . . in the United States district courts. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am by John Elwood
Banco Para el Comercio Exterior de Cuba or standard rules of agency, and whether a tort claim for personal injuries suffered in connection with travel outside of the United States is “based upon” the act occurring outside of the United States or the sale of the ticket in the United States for travel outside of the country. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
United States, holding that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 5:22 am by Amy Howe
” At Mayer Brown’s Class Defense blog, Brian Netter and Dan Himmelfarb discuss the brief filed by the United States in Fifth Third Bancorp. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:50 am by Victoria VanBuren
Supreme Court decided several cases related to arbitration: On April 27, 2011, in a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the the Federal Arbitration Act preempted California law with regard to class arbitration in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]