Search for: "Bui v. State" Results 4641 - 4660 of 9,825
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2014, 6:06 am by Joy Waltemath
His free exercise and freedom of association claims also failed as a matter of law (Fields v City of Tulsa, May 22, 2014, Hartz, H). [read post]
23 May 2014, 9:30 am by azatty
(There’s even a seminar at the upcoming State Bar Convention on the topic.) [read post]
21 May 2014, 11:03 pm by Annette Burns
      Another Facebook privacy case, United States v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:04 am by Stephen Page
It is actual reliance by the promisee, and the state of affairs so created, which answers the concern that equitable estoppel not be allowed to outflank Jorden v Money by dispensing with the need for consideration if a promise is to be enforceable as a contract. [read post]
19 May 2014, 12:04 pm
[For those wish to the long-form legal argument, the Pacific Legal Foundation briefs in Sissel v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In 2006, for instance, Justice Anthony Kennedy stated as simple fact in eBay v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:09 am by Peter Mahler
Schweitzer in JPS Partners v Binn, 2014 NY Slip Op 31204(U) [Sup Ct, NY County May 6, 2014], came at the behest of a 1.93% investor in the parent company, a New York limited liability company known as Binn and Partners, LLC, controlled by its sole managing member, Moreton Binn. [read post]
17 May 2014, 1:14 pm by Sean Hanover
For a lively and informative discussion on personal jurisdiction in the context of commercial transactions, read International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:22 pm by Submitted Post
States of the United States do not have customs regulations and most states do not have to deal with international security issues in the course of interstate commerce. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:16 pm by Jani
With the Alice Corporation v CLS Bank Supreme Court decision looming in the horizon, and the patentability of software in the US faces its most recent judicial challenge, this writer thought it was best to look at the origins of the current stance of such patents in the United States. [read post]
” Second, is the mere placement of a buy order in the United States for the purchase of foreign securities on a foreign exchange sufficient to allege that a purchaser incurred irrevocable liability in the United States, such that the U.S. securities laws govern the purchase of those securities under the Second Circuit’s decision in Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd v. [read post]