Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 5,814
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The minority in Kay would, in a nutshell, have made gateway (b) somewhat wider (Lord Bingham's not quite so famous [39]). [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 9:23 am
The following guest post was written by Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch Partner Mark J. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:55 am
; (d) it is a “given” that an authority does not have to plead and prove proportionality unless they want to ([53]); (e) it is an “exceptional” case where Art 8 would “even arguably” create a right to remain in possession where the applicant had no right to remain in domestic law (at [45], [53]) (f) implications for the private sector are left open (at [4], [50]) (g) demoted tenancies are compatible with Art 8 as the court is empowered to decide… [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:55 am
"The District's stubborn adherence to a pretrial settlement offer that barely exceeded its own expert's appraisal was unreasonable as a matter of law. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
§ 355(j)(5)(B)(i). [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:56 am
B. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 5:25 am
(b) In any event, a petition under Article 227 cannot be called a writ petition. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:41 pm
J has recently written about the existing provisions in relation to disability. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:41 pm
J has recently written about the existing provisions in relation to disability. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:16 am
Why should that matter -- it's Miami! [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:59 am
When the demand did not prompt a response, defendant on April 22, 2008 moved to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b). [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
The ex parte collaboration between Judge Stuard and the prosecution to prepare the court’s sentencing opinion was “wholly inconsistent” with the ethical constraints of Canon 3(B)(7) and DR 7-110(B). [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 9:51 pm
” b) Dr. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 10:56 am
Rhew One of those visitors was new AAO Chief Perry J. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm
s claim succeeded, on its facts, at first instance before Mackay J. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:57 pm
b. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:50 pm
Required Disclosures What: (Proposed Item 24 to Schedule 14A; Item 402(b) of Reg. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:09 am
B. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:24 pm
A prior agreement between husband and wife is only one of the matters to which the court will have regard. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:37 am
Aug. 23, 2010) (Zagel, J.). [read post]
