Search for: "Pass v. State" Results 4641 - 4660 of 28,418
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others (Respondents), heard 20-22 October 2020 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd,… [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Zachary Fasman
On Monday, June 21, the Supreme Court in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:50 am by Matthew Guariglia
One way to prevent this kind of surveillance from continuing would be to pass the Fourth is Not For Sale Act, which would ban the go [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:50 am by Matthew Guariglia
One way to prevent this kind of surveillance from continuing would be to pass the Fourth is Not For Sale Act, which would ban the go [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 8:47 am by Jill Vorobiev and Amy Harwath
On May 31, 2021, the Illinois legislature passed SB 672, a bill that amends the Illinois Freedom to Work Act, the state’s non-compete statute. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:27 am by Jason Gordon and Deborah Bessner
Maryland is the latest state to pass such legislation ahead of any action by the NCAA. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:27 am by Jason Gordon and Deborah Bessner
Maryland is the latest state to pass such legislation ahead of any action by the NCAA. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 1:43 pm by Aubrey Mandus
The Bill stands to serve as a template for other states to pass similar telemarketing legislation, particularly in light of the U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 1:43 pm by Aubrey Mandus
The Bill stands to serve as a template for other states to pass similar telemarketing legislation, particularly in light of the U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 1:39 pm by Mark Movsesian
As a consequence, an older, pre-Smith line of cases controlled, which holds that a law that burdens religion must pass "strict scrutiny": the law must serve a compelling state interest and restrict religion only as much as necessary. [read post]