Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 4641 - 4660 of 9,085
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2019, 12:33 pm by Andrew Patterson
 Before reaching them, the court also worked its way through a thicket of the INA’s provisions limiting judicial review, the most significant being INA § 242(e)(3), which specifies that only the District Court for the District of Columbia can review “determinations made under [Section 235(b)] of this title and its implementation. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
[emphasis added] Other American decisions in Vernonia School District 47J v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:09 am by Margo Schlanger
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Lomax v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:09 am by Steve Vladeck
The briefs As it did in opposing certiorari, the state of Texas leads with the argument that the district court’s denial of funding is an “administrative function and not an exercise of Article III judicial power. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 7:02 am by John Jascob
" But the court was also leery of disturbing a longstanding judicial consensus to the contrary. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:30 am by Patricia Salkin
Dewitt tried again in state court in January 2011; this time the court, although dismissing the suit with prejudice, explained that it lacked “jurisdiction to hear” the case because Dewitt had not sought timely judicial review of the Hearing Authority’s order, and the appellate court affirmed. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:36 am
The district court held it's not, and this morning, the Ninth Circuit affirms.It's a meaningful case on its own right, but made even more so by Chief Judge Kozinski's dissent. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 6:27 am
On August 2, 2014, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Arthur D. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
The Court relisted for the first time in Lanus v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 7:10 am by Jonathan Shaub
But that argument has been persuasively rejected by two well-respected district court judges (one an appointee of George W. [read post]