Search for: "State v. Manning" Results 4641 - 4660 of 13,604
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2013, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Kretschmer, Walton International Group in the Blue Sky Bugle United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am by Amy Howe
 In United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:42 pm
In a decision released yesterday, a second court in New York State has recognized the validity of a Canadian same-sex marriage.Law.com reports:Recognizing the validity of a same-sex marriage between New Yorkers contracted in Canada, a Manhattan surrogate has ruled that a man is entitled to inherit the entire estate of his deceased male partner. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am by INFORRM
IPSO  Resolution Statement 08081-21 Jenkins and Jenkins v mirror.co.uk, 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 07939-21 Dix v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement 08081-21 Capen Ltd v stokesentinel.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 09833-21 A man v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 4… [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
Jonathan Witmer-Rich (Cleveland State) posted this to a discussion list that I'm on, and graciously allowed me to forward it; it's about today's U.S. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
As the New York Times reports, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in Packingham v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
As the New York Times reports, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in Packingham v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:53 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Stay tuned over the next year as we share more stories about the current state of indigent defense, fifty years after Gideon v. [read post]
26 May 2025, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Under President Barack Obama, for example, the Department of Justice took the position that section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (which defined marriage for federal purposes as between a man and a woman) was unconstitutional but continued to enforce the provision–a step on the path that led to the Court’s decision invalidating DOMA in United States v. [read post]