Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 19,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2013, 11:01 am
That is the question at issue in AMP v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:03 am
Wilkie, in which the court declined to overrule prior precedent holding that courts should defer to an administrative agency’s reasonable interpretation of its own genuinely ambiguous regulation, maintaining that “a yawning constitutional chasm still separates Justice Kagan’s and Justice Gorsuch’s competing approaches to deference, however much the Chief Justice might wish to bridge the gulf. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:05 pm
The prior McCreary case was decided by a 5-4 vote of the Justices on June 27, 2005 — the same day that the Court, in another case (Van Orden v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:35 pm
The Court of Justice’s decision The CJEU dismissed the appeal. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
As for that one, I can say unreservedly that (1) I like Justice Dato's style and tone, but (2) have some definite thoughts about the merits as well.It's another opinion where I totally get where the Court of Appeal is coming from. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 9:16 am
Like Loving v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
In the first part, published yesterday, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Southwest Airlines v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:09 pm
Also see the Court's ruling today in the companion case of Grant v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:15 pm
(Alan S. v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 1:08 pm
Judge Wood, even if older than Judge Sotomayor and General Kagan, is still young enough to sit on the Court. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 1:32 pm
The trial court agreed.But the Court of Appeal reverses. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 7:03 am
Justice O'Connor regrets Bush v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:28 am
Also, Lilly can still enjoy years of protection for (different salts of) pemetrexed based on EP 667 and a SPC still in force. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:29 pm
Still, it's inconsistent. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:14 am
Between 1937 and 1943, he was fortunate enough to be able to appoint a remarkable number of Justices – seven – to the Court. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 12:28 pm
In the case of Bules v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 6:28 am
The Supreme Court of Canada brought a lengthy legal battle between Access Copyright and York University to an end last week, issuing a unanimous verdict written by retiring Justice Rosalie Abella that resoundingly rejected the copyright collective’s claims that its tariff is mandatory, finding that it had no standing to file a lawsuit for copyright infringement on behalf of its members, and concluding that a lower court fair dealing analysis that favoured Access… [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
Perhaps he meant to invoke the Supreme Court’s 1992 precedent in Georgia v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 10:55 am
As of now, the Court has granted certiorari (or, in one “original jurisdiction” case, Mississippi v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 1:53 pm
I think the Law Court got things wrong recently, in State v. [read post]
