Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 7,224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2015, 7:32 am
Ten days ago, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted summary affirmance (i.e., summary judgment at the appellate stage) of Judge Koh's decision to let Apple collect $450 million from Samsung (against a bond posted years ago) even though one of the patents underlying the related ruling had been held invalid by an in-house court (PTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 12:50 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall review the decision from which an appeal is taken on the record before the Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 1:22 pm
In June 2006, B&B filed for incontestability status for its trademark with the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 2:13 pm
United States, 729 F.2d 1429, 1436 (Fed. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 7:42 pm
Files: File Attachment: TAFAS_Complaint.pdf (707 KB) File Attachment: TAF.PI.pdf (1570 KB) Press Release from Kelley Drye, his attorneys: Washington, DC, August 22 – Within a day of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) publishing its final rule changes in respect to continuation practices, the USPTO and its Director, Jon Dudas, have been sued in the U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 11:34 am
This article suggests that an applicant's right to file an unlimited number of continuing applications is "[o]ne of the oddest things about the United States patent system. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:43 pm
Ricoh and Xerox filed an inter partes review which is a post grant proceeding held at the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:43 pm
Ricoh and Xerox filed an inter partes review which is a post grant proceeding held at the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 1:05 pm
Patent and Trademark Office granted Wild American Shrimp a certification mark for WILD AMERICAN shrimp (announcement here). [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
Apple and Sector Labs are undergoing a paper trial, in which each party has 30 days to gather and present evidence in paper form, to be submitted to the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:45 pm
Supreme Court twice in 1888, first with The Telephone Cases (126 U.S. 1), and then with United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:35 pm
Related posts: David Kappos Confirmed as USPTO DirectorWith no notice to the public, and after the Senate was reported to have adjourned for their August recess, on Friday, August 7, 2009, David Kappos was confirmed as Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:51 am
Sec. 292(b)) and replace it with a new Sec. 292(b) providing that “[a]ny person who has suffered a competitive injury as a result of a violation of this section may file a civil action in a district court of the United States for recovery of damages adequate to compensate for the injury. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:41 am
---When the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) affirms an examiner’s rejection of a patent application, § 145 of the Patent Act permits the disappointed applicant to challenge the Board’s decision in district court. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
B to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office is appropriate. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:38 pm
How would you state the rule? [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 9:53 am
Maria Crimi Speth And here is more detail about Maria: “Speth practices in the areas of intellectual property, internet law, and commercial litigation, representing clients throughout the United States. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 2:07 pm
He writes: The United States Patent and Trademark Office is ordered to expedite the reexamination of U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:35 am
So the exception can only kick-in in case there is a public purpose, check, and compensation for the expropriation of the use of the logo.Claimant = company respondent = stateBilateral Investment Treaties can be a vehicle for companies to get a binding tribunal judgement against a non-compliant state via for example the Arbitration Rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 2:43 pm
This week my most popular blog post in a long time brought to light the fact that the United States Patent and Trademark Office now believes one of Apple's iPhone design patents underlying the bulk of a $540 million judgment against Samsung shouldn't have been granted in the first place since it merely combined existing design elements.In that post I expressed hopes that Samsung would take the design patent issues in that case to… [read post]
