Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 9,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am
United States, 491 U.S. 617, 624-25 (1989) (noting and accepting the government’s concession on this score); United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 8:06 am
STATE OF NEW YORK v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 7:49 am
However, in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
§337(a), which explicitly provides that all enforcement of the FDCA "shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 3:44 am
E.g., Roadway Express, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 7:56 pm
Even if Democrats keep the Senate and retake the House, does anyone seriously believe they would unite behind a plan to sideline the state legislatures (we have certainly seen Democrats refuse to back controversial procedural changes). [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:14 am
Among the reasons frequently cited for the higher incidence of litigation in the United States compared to the rest of the world is the acceptability of contingent fees for plaintiffs’ counsel and general rules that each party to a lawsuit in the U.S. bears its own costs. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 8:42 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 12:30 pm
The Appeals Court had a momentous decision to make in Killorin v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:03 am
Arguing on behalf of the United States, Assistant to the Solicitor General Nicole A. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:38 pm
(You’ll be comforted to know that, according to the Court in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:02 am
The retail industry in the United States has yet to solve its growing problem of “retail shrink,” which is defined as “the difference between the amount of merchandise (or inventory) that the retail company owns on its books, and the results of a physical count of the merchandise. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 6:39 pm
Navy Seals 1-26 v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:50 am
The United States should be right in there, and not just monitoring it, given as far reaching and serious as this case is. [read post]
3 May 2017, 6:01 am
The decision is United States v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 6:01 am
The decision is United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 7:43 am
This right was extended in Roe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:30 am
Perhaps it is time to consider ignoring the United States Supreme Court when it unduly burdens and interferes with our democracy without first showing an "irreconcilable variance" between a law and clear constitutional text or largely undisputed history behind the text. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
’”Alito noted that defenders of Roe had failed to discharge their burden of showing “that the Court had the authority to decide how abortion may be regulated in the States. [read post]
