Search for: "Chambers v. State"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 4,896
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
“Tool Without A Handle: A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1] This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:31 am
Recent events are additional evidence for my thesis that we are at the end of the Reagan regime and in the midst of disjunctive presidency.A central reason why Trump is getting nothing done is that the Republican coalition of the Reagan regime—which currently controls both national and most state governments—is far weaker than it appears on the surface. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:53 am
These cases and other matters from the last month are discussed in greater detail after the jump.The SEC v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm
Vermont National Telephone Company v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm
The size of the Supreme Court did increase from 6 justices at the founding, to 7 and then 9, before 1861, as the population and number of states in the union increased exponentially. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:16 pm
The internet platform then standing in the role of the state, but the state can go after the enterprise where it fails in its monitoring and controlling functions. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 4:46 am
” The title itself comes from the case Joel v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm
” Her brief states those questions include: Stewart Parnell, right, as portrayed by a courtroom artist during the 2014 trial. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm
In Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:36 am
The Treasury Department also said Kerimov was an official of the Russian government and a member of Russia’s upper chamber of parliament. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm
Acceptance of the writ, which is rare, would mean the two DeCoster v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am
If Collins’s effort is successful and Schiff gets his way, Bolton has publicly stated that he will comply with a Senate subpoena for his testimony despite the White House’s claim that he is absolutely immune from such testimony. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:52 am
Additionally, these decisions have not been affirmed by the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, the rulings of which carry greater authority. [read post]
12 May 2019, 5:06 am
” This exclusion is nowhere stated in the White Paper. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 5:29 am
More recently, the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Zakharov v Russia stated that “the interception authorisation, … must clearly identify a specific person …or single set of premises”. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
Question: Henson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm
Lawcast 207: Adam Shutkever and Jeremy Hopkins of Riverview Chambers on new legal services delivery Today I am talking to Adam Shutkever, COO of LawVest, which launched Riverview Law in February – Riverview Law is the trading name of LawVest Limited – and Jeremy Hopkins, late of 3 Verulam Buildings where he was a clerk. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 12:39 am
Difícil será convencer a la víctima o pacientes de la desigualdad de criterio por mucho que la discrepancia de resultado pueda deberse a la siguientes circunstancias que pueden inclinar la balanza de la Justicia en cada caso: El distinto criterio del Consejo consultivo, que puede ser más generoso o restrictivo en sus dictámenes ante las reclamaciones de esta naturaleza. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
The obstruction charge does include a statement that the charged actions were “consistent with President Trump’s previous efforts to undermine United States Government investigations into foreign interference in United States elections. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
