Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 4661 - 4680 of 29,830
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2020, 3:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
To be sure, "[f]iring multiple shots undercuts a claim of self-defense" once a defendant disables the purported aggressor. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 1:21 pm by luiza
(DOJ; USAO) In what was likely an exciting event for fellow travelers, a married Ashburn, Virginia couple was arrested at John F. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 10:43 am by Michael Lowe
Defending Against Allegations of Fraudulent Billing to Federal Benefit Programs Health care providers in the State of Texas seeking reimbursement or payment for services rendered to persons in their care or charge must understand they are vulnerable to investigation and prosecution by either federal or state law enforcement for health care fraud crimes. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
One of the challenges that the defendants made on appeal to the admissibility of Dr. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Verity Int’l, Ltd., 443 F.3d 48.The decision is posted on the Internet at:https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20200617069 [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Verity Int’l, Ltd., 443 F.3d 48.The decision is posted on the Internet at:https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20200617069 [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Jones later advised that "[i]f all services are secular and [i]f you were willing to remove this content from your website, we could continue the approval process. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 3:29 pm by Evan Brown
., 934 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 2019), the court observed that “Section 230(c)(1) limits liability based on the function the defendant performs, not its identity. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 3:29 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
., 934 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 2019), the court observed that “Section 230(c)(1) limits liability based on the function the defendant performs, not its identity. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 11:45 am by Paul Cassell
The majority found this appointment a "troubling indication" of the district court's "mistaken understanding" of its role in ruling on an unopposed Rule 48(a) motion: Whatever the extent of the district court's "narrow" role under Rule 48(a), see Fokker Servs., 818 F.3d at 742, that role does not include designating an advocate to defend Flynn's continued prosecution. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 4:17 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 The SEC will not be able to have the defendant disgorge all revenue, which will reduce the exposure for many defendants. [read post]