Search for: "Fields v. A S" Results 4661 - 4680 of 17,270
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
  AUSAs, INS perceived, much like most lawyers practicing in disparate legal fields, seemed genetically indisposed (pardon the imminent seafood puns) to pry open grimy immigration mollusks because they had more delectable fish to fry. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 3:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Article 8 does not give a right to a home, Chapman v UK (2001) EHRR 18, and it was the discriminatory impact on people seeking a home that was at the centre of the claimant’s case. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
In this regard, the threshold for distinctiveness is not dependent on the public’s level of attention (Smart Technologies v OHIM, C‑311/11 P).Lack of distinctive character of the mark applied forAs regards the issue of distinctive character, the applicant maintained that the relevant public would perceive the mark as the letter ‘v’ for ‘vericiguat’ rather than a representation of a heart. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:20 pm
Apple’s brand position was discussed by Neil Wilkof in this post. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The fruition of that absorption of DP law into Article 8 is apparent in the recent decision of Catt v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:05 pm by Bill Marler
Two pumps are located on the main Wellton canal near the lateral canal split that supplies water to fields of the suspect farm; one gasoline powered pump on a trailer and one permanent electric pump with an attached hose. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:32 pm by Bill Marler
Two pumps are located on the main Wellton canal near the lateral canal split that supplies water to fields of the suspect farm; one gasoline powered pump on a trailer and one permanent electric pump with an attached hose. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:50 am
 In two recent decisions (“Unwired Planet” and “Conversant”) (Unwired Planet v Huawei [2018] EWCA Civ 2344, IPKat post here; Huawei v Conversant [2019] EWCA Civ 38, IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal has endorsed this practice.Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 1:11 pm by Ronald Mann
The second and last argument of the week came in the Supreme Court’s most important bankruptcy case of the year, Mission Product Holdings Inc. v. [read post]