Search for: "MATTER OF D S N"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 5,780
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2010, 3:09 am
First the Appellate Division noted that judicial review of an arbitration decision is limited and such a decision will not be disturbed unless it is violative of a strong public policy, is totally irrational or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator’s power, citing Matter of the Town of Callicoon, 70 NY2d 907. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:56 am
Corp., 48 AD3d 450 [2008]; N. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
The claimed formulation is distinguished from the preparations according to document D3 by containing an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist. [5] In order to decide whether the requirements of A 56 are met, it has to be examined if the problem as formulated above has indeed been solved by the subject-matter claimed, and if the claimed solution is not obvious in the light of the disclosure in the prior art. [6] N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, like xenon, are known to be… [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 8:03 am
Wurie, 612 F.Supp.2d 104, 109 (D. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:24 pm
D. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:23 pm
Gilles McDougallA/Secretary General | Secrétaire général par int.Copyright Board of Canada | Commission du droit d'auteur du Canada56 Sparks, Suite| Bureau 800Ottawa ON K1A 0C9Telephone | Téléphone 613.952.8624Gilles.mcdougall@cb-cda.gc.ca ************************************** [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:25 am
The matters referred to in paragraph 1 are: (a) the legal nature of account-held securities; (b) the legal nature and the requirements of an acquisition or disposition of account-held securities as well as its effects between the parties and against third parties; (c) whether a disposition of account-held securities extends to entitlements to dividends or other distributions, or redemption, sale or other proceeds; (d) the effectiveness of an acquisition or disposition and whether… [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:10 am
The USPTO interprets Public Law 107-273, section 13202(d) (codified as 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:00 am
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 DUBLIN 001020 SUBJECT: EMERGING CONSTRAINTS ON U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:02 pm
Ripston stated that the district court’s ruling was not the end of the matter, emphasizing that “it’s a long road ahead until final victory. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:43 pm
Given the controversy and complexity of this matter, that seems more than reasonable. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:07 am
Please click here the read the Court's opinion. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:59 am
I'm concerned the Carry-On Coat may share n this design by placing both the iPad pocket and toiletries pocket layered on the same side of the jacket. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:05 am
Gilles McDougallA/Secretary General | Secrétaire général par int.Copyright Board of Canada | Commission du droit d'auteur du Canada56 Sparks, Suite| Bureau 800Ottawa ON K1A 0C9Telephone | Téléphone 613.952.8624Gilles.mcdougall@cb-cda.gc.caGilles.mcdougall@cb-cda.gc.ca> *****************HK [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
William Bounds, Ltd (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking plaintiff must meet rule 9(b) pleading for intent: Simonian v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 2:06 pm
Sep: Internet Advertising is an Abstract Idea says US D... [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 3:46 pm
We think that many basic moral principles must, as a moral matter, remain constant among cultures. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:07 pm
Universal (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) US Copyright Group – ‘Put up or shut up’ time for US Copyright Group (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) US Copyright Group – Class action lawsuit challenges Bittorent lawsuit factory’s business model (Internet Cases) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions District Court E D Virginia: Awards domain holder common law trademark right & orders registrar to return domains: Weitzman v Lead Networks… [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:09 am
At defendant Hall’s guilty plea hearing, which is a matter of public record, government counsel stated that: Mr. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:08 pm
” In re N., 96 N.J. [read post]
