Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am
Lifestyle Equities C.V. and another v Ahmed and another, heard 20th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 R (on the application of Toraane and another) v… [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
Ko`olau pali at Kane`ohe Bay (koolaupokohcc.org) In its recent decision in State of Hawaii v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:59 am
VeriSign Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re… [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC… [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:39 am
Finally, Monday’s grant of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:09 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 8:08 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Supreme Court Hears Copyright Battle Between Google and Oracle First off today, Adam Liptak at The New York Times reports that the Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments in the Google v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
United States (1944) and Trump v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
Nevertheless, the newspaper repeated the defamation: in an article alongside a photograph of Watters the newspaper had stated: We may have to apologise to this revolting pervert but will we mean it? [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am
Individuals with law degrees occupy roughly half the state governorships, more than half the seats in the United States Senate, and more than a third of the seats in the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:23 pm
(Baumancites and quotation marks omitted).The only exception to Bauman’s state of incorporation/principal place of business rule is for “exceptional” situations similar to Perkins v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
The majority expressed some doubt about whether that tire chalking is actually a search under the physical trespass theory of United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 12:14 pm
”So, what’s the future hold for Google’s mark? [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 8:39 am
Falcon Stainless, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
Bank of the United States (1824) and Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1833). [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am
The Guardian reports on the ongoing defamation claim between Clive Palmer and Mark McGowan. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 11:03 am
ObamaKlayman v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
§337(a), which states:“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter [the entire FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
