Search for: "P. T.2" Results 4661 - 4680 of 14,913
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2015, 9:09 pm by Leslie Sammis
If an acceptable negotiation isn't completed within 10 days, then it is unlikely it will be completed at all. [read post]
29 May 2009, 5:35 am
., 81 P.3d 618 (Okla. 2003), which is the leading (and nearly only) case in the country to adopt "principal place of business" as a choice of law principle in class action cases. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:56 am
See Ocular Sciences at p.429... [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:01 am by Bexis
Mountain Fuel Supply Co., 858 P.2d 970, 979 (Utah 1993) (“medical test for early detection exists”; “prescribed . [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
As noted by one judge, “[t]he concept of Facebook is relatively new. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 3:48 am by Charles Sartain
After trial the jury found (1) W&T breached the JOA; (2) Apache’s damages were $43 million; (3) Apache was not required to obtain W&T’s approval; (4) Apache engaged in bad faith; thereby causing WMT not to comply with the JOA; and (5) W&T was entitled to an offset of $17 million. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:00 am by Dennis Crouch
(2) What is the effect of cancellation, in particular, is it like canceling a magazine subscription where the former subscriber isn’t off the hook for past-due bills; or, is it like an annulment – an Ab Initio Extinguishment? [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
PÉNAL (DROIT) — garanties fondamentales du processus pénal — droit à la protection contre tous traitements ou peines cruels et inusités — peine minimale — suramende compensatoire — constitutionnalité de l’article 737 C.Cr. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 6:15 pm by Schachtman
(N.T. 1/29/15, afternoon, pp. p. 27, ln. 2 10-11, p. 28, lns. 7-12). [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 9:28 am by admin
If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. [read post]