Search for: "Reiter v Reiter" Results 4661 - 4680 of 6,282
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2015, 1:32 am by Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
In the recent rulings of McGraddie v McGraddie [2013] UKSC 58 and Henderson v Foxworth Investments Ltd [2014] UKSC 41 the Supreme Court overturned an appellate court for interfering with a trial judge’s findings of fact. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:16 am by SHG
We note, however, that such questions were improper (see People v Paul, 229 AD2d 932; People v Paul, 212 AD2d 1020, 1021, lv denied 85 NY2d 912; People v Edwards, 167 AD2d 864, lv denied 77 NY2d 877). [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:42 am by Deborah Pearlstein
With the majority in Hirabayashi v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:36 am by Matthew Flinn
In Edwards v United Kinghdom (2002) 35 EHRR 19, it said only that: …there must be a sufficient element of public scrutiny of the investigation or its results to secure accountability in practice as well as in theory. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:37 pm by Erin Miller
  With the majority in Hirabayashi v. [read post]