Search for: "State v. Cash " Results 4661 - 4680 of 5,707
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
COLA's auditor also stated that Miracle Star did not provide adequate records for the audit, which caused the auditor to be unable to determine if Miracle Star had provided all specific services stated in the contract. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 3:17 am
[Readers:  The fact pattern for Quirky Question # 147 arose in the State of Washington. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:53 am by admin
  Justice Quince is asking the right questions   In effect, Justice Quince is asking the same question at the heart of Kelo v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:26 am by Carter Ruml
When the facts are as unfavorable to the taxpayer as they were in Estate of Malkin v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:26 am by Carter Ruml
  When the facts are as unfavorable to the taxpayer as they were in Estate of Malkin v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am by Don Cruse
Lost Property, Mislaid Property, and Treasure Trove The State of Texas v. $281,420.00 in United States Currency, No. 08? [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:16 pm by Cal Law
”The hearing started with a video presentation of judicial campaign commercials that recently aired in other states. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
Dustcontrol International (EPLAW)   United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): Infringement action won't be stayed pending foreign decision in non-patent claim: Elmotech Ltd & Anor v Guidance Ltd & Anor (PatLit)   United States US General Director Kappos testimony to Congress (Patently-O) Judge Michel: USPTO should receive $1 billion infusion of cash (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) The US Reporting on IPRs - the Watch List (IP tango) Industrial design in Canada and… [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:32 pm by Carter Ruml
If you want a break from politics, however, we can take you back to the normal state of things (i.e., all transfer taxes, all the time) with a report on a truly resounding taxpayer FLP win: Estate of Murphy v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:32 pm by Carter Ruml
If you want a break from politics, however, we can take you back to the normal state of things (i.e., all transfer taxes, all the time) with a report on a truly resounding taxpayer FLP win: Estate of Murphy v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:21 am by MacIsaac
 Specifically the High Court stated as follows: [82] The issue addressed in the passage from Gordon v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Schedule 2.1(b) contains a list of 40 patent applications and patents related to the results of Protogene’s research and development. [23] […] Certain assets are excluded from the Agreement, in particular contractual employment arrangements as well as cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and accounts or notes receivable of the seller. [24] While the Agreement explicitly refers to Protogene’s opposition against the European patent in suit as “an… [read post]