Search for: "State v. Mar" Results 4661 - 4680 of 4,938
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
 As was pointed out in the Parliamentary debates on the Data Protection Bill (particuarly by Lord Lester, Hansard, HL, 24 Mar 1998), the test of “necessity” in Article 9 is ignored by section 32. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:31 pm by Michelle Yeary
            The case is Smith v. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 7:00 am by jonathanturley
When Smith indicted Trump over documents at Mar-a-Lago, I wrote that I thought the indictment was well-supported and a serious threat to Trump. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:50 am by Brian Greer
But under a series of cases, the most well-known of which is United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:28 am
This at least is the conclusion one can draw from Case T-28/08, Mars v OHIM, in which the Court of First Instance of the European Communities confirmed that its Community trade mark for the three-dimensional shape of its Bounty bar was invalidly registered (see commentary on this decision here). [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  He argued that the clause was indistinguishable from clauses enforced in other dissolution cases including Ehrlich v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:50 am by Brian Greer
But under a series of cases, the most well-known of which is United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:35 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” In Seibel v Ramsay (___ AD3d ___, 2024 NY Slip Op 01617 [1st Dept Mar. 21, 2024]), the Court considered the propriety of a $4 million post-trial attorneys’ fee award to celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay under a contractual indemnification provision. [read post]