Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 5,862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [June 25, 2009]), the United States Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause requires that in order for the prosecution to be able to introduce a forensic laboratory report at trial, the prosecutor must present a live witness to testify to the truth of the statements made in the report subject to cross-examination. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:32 pm
United States, 527 U. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:14 pm
The case of Sorrell v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
In, Pliva v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:35 pm
The case of Bullcoming v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:46 am
United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:15 am
But in Virginia State Bd. of Pharmacy v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
Supreme Court decided Bullcoming v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:23 am
09-1039), and Actavis, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
The opinion is Sorrell v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:34 am
Breyer wrote for the dissenters, including Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:27 am
The United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:07 am
United States, but this time Justice Kennedy joined the four liberal justices to hold that criminal defendants who enter into plea agreements can benefit from retroactive changes to the sentencing guidelines.In CSX Transportation v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:03 am
United States, No. 09-10245. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:20 pm
In Turner v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:39 am
Wal-Mart v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:24 am
In announcing the selection, Sotomayor stated: "For over twenty-seven years, Chief Judge Ricardo H. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:24 am
In announcing the selection, Sotomayor stated: "For over twenty-seven years, Chief Judge Ricardo H. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:07 pm
Specifically, the Court stated the displacement test as simply “whether the statute speaks directly to the question at issue,” and that in this case, Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/288609.opn.doc.pdf State v. [read post]
