Search for: "US v. West" Results 4661 - 4680 of 8,407
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2014, 6:03 am by Ben
She also issued an injunction barring further unlawful screenings.She ordered Mr Luxton to pay £65,000 in legal costs, pending final assessment of sum he owes, with estimates putting the final sum as anything up to £125,000 - with one report saying the Judge exclaimed ""Goodness me" on hearing the League's costs bill.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-west-wales-25968200 and some earlier wise words on what might happen after the MPS v Murphy case on… [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:18 am by Ben
Calling the blocks "ineffectual", the court stated that the blocks would "constitute an infringement of [people's] freedom to act at their discretion".Blocking orders have been upheld in the United Kingdom, France and Belgium and the AG's opinion UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH und Wega Filmproduktionsgesellschaft GmbH (see Jeremy's blog here)  was that Member States are to ensure that copyright holders or holders of related rights are able to apply for… [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 4:00 pm by Tom Goldstein and Amy Howe
  And the treatise canvasses some of the important new additions to the Court’s mootness jurisprudence, from its 2013 decision in Decker v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 8:45 am by Eric Muller
Adam Liptak today covers an effort to persuade the Solicitor General to try to persuade the Supreme Court to use the pending cert petition in Hedges v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 11:27 pm by Arnold, Wadsworth & Coggins
§ 30-3-5 (West) Other states have used similar statutes and definitions in its analysis. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 4:27 pm by Arnold & Wadsworth
§ 30-3-5 (West) Other states have used similar statutes and definitions in its analysis. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:08 am by Kit Case
In 2013 one employee fraud case did crack the Top Ten, so the record is now 49-1 (employer fraud v. employee fraud) over the past five years. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
§ 101 (West 2014) (“T [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
TERIX COMPUTER ND Cali 2014http://t.co/r8N6zDq81Q -> BitTorrent user found liable for direct and contributory infringement PURZEL VIDEO v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
TERIX COMPUTER ND Cali 2014http://t.co/r8N6zDq81Q -> BitTorrent user found liable for direct and contributory infringement PURZEL VIDEO v. [read post]