Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 14,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2024, 5:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 3:10 pm
In State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
In commentary at CNN International, Aaron Carroll weighs in, describing this Term as “a pivotal moment for the Supreme Court, for politics, and for the future of health care reform in the United States. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 4:45 pm
(“GPNE”) appeals from a final decision ofthe United States District Court for the Northern Districtof California. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:40 am
Meanwhile, the United States is intensifying its own campaign against the Islamic State in Syria. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 10:33 pm
The interpretation of the United States Constitution on this important issue is overdue and resolved most appropriately by this Court. [read post]
2 May 2018, 9:40 am
In Barbosa v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 6:31 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Cardozo and Judge Learned Hand.Few non-lawyers have ever heard of the ALI, but it is one of the most important nongovernmental legal institutions in the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 11:28 am
Dahda v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:25 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am
United States, and its significance in deciding this case questioning how long a traffic stop can be extended to wait for the drug dog to show and do as he’s told: The apparent confusion in the courtroom was useful in one respect: It illuminated the cluelessness of Chief Justice John Roberts when it comes to traffic stops. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:00 am
The court noted that a similar statute was ruled unconstitutional in Wolf v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:00 am
The court noted that a similar statute was ruled unconstitutional in Wolf v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 11:45 am
Allergan retained rights to exploit the patents "for all FDA-approved uses in the United States". [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:14 am
As the United States Supreme Court has noted, "People in an open society do not demand infallibility from their institutions, but it is difficult for them to accept what they are prohibited from observing. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
” Judge Watson’s analysis reminds me of a colloquy in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm
In a 233-page blockbuster decision, Uri Avnery v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 8:36 am
Thus, at least technically, ITC proceedings are “by and in the name of the United States” as required by the FDCA act. [read post]
