Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 4681 - 4700 of 13,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2018, 5:31 am by Barry Sookman
I also teach intellectual property law at Osgoode Hall Law School and have published books including on copyright and Internet law.[1] I have both a practical and theoretical understanding of copyright. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 6:15 am
The Supreme Court has therefore asked the CJEU to answer the following questions (please note that this is my own translation from Swedish):Does the leasing of cars, equipped with a radio receiver, mean that the leasing company, is a user who provides a communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29 or a communication to the public within the meaning of Article 8(2) of Directive 2006/115, respectively? [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 8:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 5:02 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The lawsuit purports to be filed on behalf of a class of persons who purchased their Marriott shares between November 9, 2016 and November 29, 2018. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 2:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The revised framework was organized into a 4-part analysis, found at para 82, (1) Notice. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 6:30 pm by FM Librarian
," Cogent Social Sciences, vol. 4, no. 1 (2018)"Why Here? [read post]
Standing before the judge Thursday morning, Cohen stated, “I made these statements to be consistent with Individual-1’s political messaging and to be loyal to Individual-1. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 12:59 pm by Giles Peaker
Moreover, the applicant does not challenge the Convention compliance of that legislation as such. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 6:20 am by Drew York
  But Duncey’s outside counsel is confident that the major commercial customer does not have the authority to terminate the contract early, and is lobbying Duncey’s to file a lawsuit that could result in $10 million in damages. [read post]