Search for: "J True" Results 4681 - 4700 of 7,778
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2012, 1:24 pm by Schachtman
Sometimes when federal courts permit dubious causation opinion testimony over Rule 702 objections, the culprit is bad lawyering by the opponent of the proffered testimony. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 10:16 am by Matt Van Steenkiste
., AX Armani Exchange, babyGap, Bachrach, Banana Republic, Bare Escentuals, BCBG Max Azria, bebe, Betsey Johnson, Brighton Collectibles, Brooks Brothers, Brookstone, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Burberry, Cache, Coach, Cole Haan, Crate & Barrel, Crocs, EB Games, Eddie Bauer, Meijer, Whole Foods, Trader Joes’, Express/Expressmen, Foot Locker, For Love 21, Fossil, Franklin Covey, Free People, Gap,GapKids, Gucci, Guess, J. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:30 am
In fact, it seems the exact opposite is true; physicians rarely seek professional help in dealing with depression because they are afraid of the stigma attached to the condition. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
Indeed the English Courts had for a long time expressed some discomfort with exercising jurisdiction over questions of infringement of foreign patents, for example, per Aldous J in Plastus Kreativ v Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. [1995] RPC 438 at 447:  “For myself I would not welcome the task of having to decide whether a person had infringed a foreign patent. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 5:39 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
I’ve said it many times before but it’s true that I have the best readers in the blogosphere. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 8:10 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
New Brunswick Liquor Corp., 1979 CanLII 23 (SCC), [1979] 2 S.C.R. 227, where Dickson J. urged restraint in assessing the decisions of specialized administrative tribunals. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
  Courts should recognize that there are spurious associations with RR >> 2, and true, causal associations with RR < 2. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 3:13 am by Mandelman
    Understanding FHA’s latest report with Ed Pinto… Edward J. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Declarations of intent, as is generally acknowledged, should be interpreted in order to ascertain the true intention of the declaring party rather than adhering to the literal meaning of the declaration. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The present Board agrees with the opinion expressed in decision J 5/80 as summarised in the above headlines. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
 Earlier this year, at [2012] EWHC 1722 (Ch), Arnold J said Interflora could call witnesses from the first exercise but not from the second exercise. [read post]